Researching William Byrd, in March 2023 I took
a trip along the new Elizabeth Line to Zone 6 in West London to visit
Harlington and on the way home called at Westminster Roman Catholic Cathedral
to attend a service which included the great composer’s music. Harlington has
not been mentioned during the Byrd celebrations on the BBC so now I make amends.
The following are extracts from the new book ‘The
Life and Times of William Byrd: A Local History’ now available.
The Byrd family moved to Harlington, near
Uxbridge, in 1577 where they are named by the churchwardens of the parish
church for non-attendance. From 1581 fines of £20 per month were imposed for
non-attendance, but it is unclear whether he actually paid any fines[1].
The final entry for non-attendance at
Harlington is dated 7th April 1592, covering the period between 31st
August 1591 and 31st March 1592. These presentations name William’s wife
as Julian. At Stondon, Byrd’s wife is named Ellen, but she is the same person[3].
(During Byrd’s time at Harlington he falls under suspicion with involvement in the Throckmorton Plot then the Babington Plot to overthrow the Queen.)
In closing the net on the conspirators, Francis Walsingham, chief spymaster, and interrogator, discovered letters from Byrd to the Pagets. By February 1584 Byrd had been questioned and was expected not to stray too far from his home at Harlington.
Investigators into the Babington Plot find a letter on the person of John Reason[4], Byrd’s servant, to “m[aste]r Fyton”. Walsingham’s office diary notes: “’To seek out matters against Bryde’, ‘to sende to Fra[nci]s Mylls m[aste]r Brydes note’ and ‘To sende for M[aste]r Byrde’”[5].
[1] In
‘The Elizabethans’ (2011), A.N. Wilson suggests that the Byrd family was always
short of money because they were required to pay “stiff fines” for
non-attendance at Church. There is no evidence to suggest that the Byrds paid
any fines. Another historian suggests that the Queen personally intervened to
prevent the family paying fines. Wilson also suggests that the exclusive right
to print music was in some way compensation for a poorly paid job and that “the
Anglo-Catholic Queen” effectively authorised the setting of Latin Masses by
Byrd (Wilson, 2011, 195). Whilst there is evidence that The Queen preferred
more ritual in worship authorisation of Latin Masses would be politically
undesirable. Byrd though interprets the remit widely. Wilson adds elsewhere
that there were many Catholic sympathisers in the legal profession, and this
was acceptable “so long as they kept quiet about it and did not attempt to
proselytise” (Wilson, 2011, 196). Keeping quiet about something does not
necessarily mean the behaviour is acceptable. Finally, Wilson says that the
government “would have deemed itself irresponsible not to suppress Jesuit
missionaries” who “in most cases rightly [were] actively engaged in treason …
[plotting] the murder of the head of state and overthrow of the system”
(Wilson, 2011, 196). This is explored later in the text. Other historians
suggest Catholic suppression was widespread – fearful of being caught.
[2]
Reeve, 1900, 33
[3] John
Harley (1997) says that this is an error on the part of the ecclesiastical
court in Essex, assuming Byrd’s wife to be Ellen or Helena, and claims Byrd did
not remarry. This is supported by Byrd’s family tree contained in Visitations
of Essex dated 1634: ERO D/DQs/43
[4] Philip Brett (2007)
notes that Julian Byrd and John Reason were cited for recusancy in 1577 (Brett,
2007,126)
[5]
Harley, 2010, 129
[6]
Morris, 1875, 142 The
troubles of our Catholic forefathers related by themselves. First [--third]
series (archive.org) accessed 15 February 2023
[7]
Caraman, 1964, 41
No comments:
Post a Comment